Time to grow up The Token Alliance, an initiative of the Chamber of Digital Commerce, has laid out a set of guidelines for token sponsors and regulators to meet in the middle. It's just what the industry needs to move beyond the fringe, writes Michael J. Casey. Read more in THE TAKEAWAY below.  |
TOP TRENDS ON COINDESK
ETF watch
Chatter about an upcoming decision by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) over whether to approve a rule change that would allow bitcoin-based exchange traded funds (ETFs) has certainly made headlines this week, though it isn’t the first time such a proposal has crossed the agency’s desk.
The proposal in question submitted on June 20 and later released to the public for comment attracted a total of 250 different voices all weighing in on the pros and cons of a bitcoin ETF.
The overwhelming majority of the opinions raised to the SEC urged immediate action, claiming that a regulatory approval would change crypto markets for the better, making them a safer, more trustworthy space for investors.
But for all the talk, the SEC’s response has been rather sluggish, given that the agency said a decision on an even earlier bitcon ETF proposal made back in January would have to be postponed until September.
While it has yet to be confirmed whether the one put forth by the Chicago Board Options Exchange (Cboe) and SolidX in June will similarly be postponed past August, the SEC did issue a second rejection on still yet another bitcoin ETF proposal by Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss.
Nevertheless, the SEC will have to act soon given that continuing uncertainty over regulatory approval for a bitcoin ETF seems to be encouraging even more proposals on the matter, with one crypto company announcing this week it would seek ETF approval for not only bitcoin but the top ten cryptocurrencies in the market.
Dangerous times
The latest apps on the world’s second most popular blockchain, ethereum, have been gaining attention as of late for promoting risky, and in some cases, flat-out lethal behavior.
The nature of decentralized applications (dapps) such as FOMO 3D and PoWH3D, which are two of ethereum’s top performing apps, attract users with “pay-per-bid auction models” akin to Ponzi schemes where value is only generated so long as new users keep joining.
Meanwhile, Augur, the decentralized prediction market platform where users bet on the outcomes of real-world events, has taken a dark turn. Some have begun to bet on the possible deaths, and more specifically murders, of certain high-profile individuals such as politicians and celebrities.
While the brazen activity on ethereum has raised concerned eyebrows, developers of the platform such as Alex Van de Sande maintain that dapps, broadly, are an integral part of advancing both the blockchain industry and the broader vision of a decentralized Internet.
Eye on China
China has been in the headlines this week for a number of different developments, both favorable and otherwise to crypto enthusiasts.
The week began with confirmation from authorities in the Xinjiang Uyghur region over rumored efforts to shut down unauthorized bitcoin mining operations with the help of local utility companies. Indeed, utility companies are now tasked with eliminating all bitcoin mining activity not formally registered with the government by the end of August or face consequences by Chinese authorities.
Then came news of a blockchain fund valued at $1 billion losing support from the Hangzhou city government, which had reportedly agreed to contribute around $4 million to the fund back in April.
At the same time, a different blockchain-related investment fund, valued at $1.4 billion, announced it had been rather successful in gaining municipal support in the city of Nanjing.
The Nanjing government is set to contribute 30% of the total fund aimed specifically at early-stage blockchain startups and participating academic institutions.
What’s more, new private-sector blockchain ventures seem to be proliferating in China.
For example, one of country's oldest and most popular social networking platforms known as Tianya Club announced this week a release date for its blockchain-based Tianyan Token (TYT).
Meanwhile, software company YLZ Info confirmed development of a blockchain-based vaccine monitoring system in partnership with Alibaba's payment affiliate, Ant Financial.
|
⭐ CoinDesk Weekly Sponsor ⭐  The Oxford Fintech Programme gives you the tools you need to build the future of transactions and commerce. In this online fintech programme, you’ll explore emerging technologies that will disrupt marketplaces and financial services, and examine the state of the industry and plan disruptive intra- or entre-preneurial interventions. Find Out More |
QUOTE OF THE WEEK "[T]he Commission's interpretation and application of the statutory standard sends a strong signal that innovation is unwelcome in our markets, a signal that may have effects far beyond the fate of bitcoin ETPs." |
Michael J. Casey is the chairman of CoinDesk's advisory board and a senior advisor for blockchain research at MIT's Digital Currency Initiative.
The token industry needs to grow up.
I’m not talking about financial growth, at least not for now. With $20 billion raised in “initial coin offerings” and an overall token market valuation of $300 billion, early participants in crypto finance have done a spectacular job of “growing” their monetary value as measured by the very fiat currencies many claim are being disrupted.
But if digital tokens are to matter, and if they are to enable networks of distributed trust, the industry needs to advance to adulthood.
Only with a self-regulating system — in which broadly accepted norms of behavior, modes of communication and business practices are encouraged — can the industry shake off a Wild West image of Lambo-loving scammers and move from the fringe to the mainstream.
This, by the way, is also the only way to experience true and meaningful financial growth by which opportunities are distributed beyond a small set of early adopters to a wider array of participants in the $100 trillion world economy.
As such, it is encouraging to see proactive efforts to promote best practices. The most recent such effort comes from the Token Alliance, an industry initiative of the Digital Chamber of Commerce that comprises 350 global industry participants, including blockchain and token experts, technologists, economists, former regulators, and practitioners from over 20 law firms.
On Monday, the Alliance will release its first white paper, one that aims to bring two important constituencies — industry leaders and regulators – into alignment around the appropriate business and legal treatment of digital token issuances.
In particular, it seeks clarity for tokens that are not intended as investment contracts — typically those that have a "utility" value in driving a decentralized network of users — and for that reason, deserve to be excluded from existing securities laws.
According to a foreword from Token Alliance co-chairs Jim Newsome, a former CFTC Chairman, and Paul Atkins, a former SEC commissioner, the principles outlined in the report “are designed to help market participants understand the parameters around their activity and to act in a fair and responsible manner toward potential purchasers.”
At the same time, Newsom and Atkins add that these guidelines can help policymakers understand the technology better so as to avoid drafting draconian rules, potentially creating “an environment of regulatory arbitrage, or even worse, unintentionally decrease the attractiveness of a jurisdiction regarding innovation and jobs creation.”
It takes two...
The key point here is that this is two-way street.
On the one hand, policymakers clearly need educating – as highlighted by Rep. Brad Sherman’s ludicrous suggestion to ban bitcoin during Congressional hearings a week and a half ago.
But on the other hand, regulators are going to be much more willing to give the industry the regulatory space it needs to flourish if there isn’t widespread public anger over unsavory and exploitative behavior in the crypto community.
As smugly satisfying as it was to read all the “Old Man Yells at Cloud” memes that mocked Sherman, his and other lawmakers’ misplaced proposals were prompted by some pretty shoddy industry behavior, especially in the initial coin offerings (ICOs) market.
Assessments of ICOs have concluded that as many as two-thirds of those in 2017 were scams. Notably, the lament heard most widely and vociferously about this problem is from within the crypto community itself, with serious developers complaining constantly about “shitcoins” and “vaporware” projects raising eight-, nine-, even ten-figure amounts without building a single thing.
Some in the community would much prefer that the whole "ICO" thing would go away. (In all fairness, "ICO" really is a terrible term, one that immediately labels tokens as purely a money-raising enterprise, substitutable for an IPO.) They want the world to recognize the relative purity of bitcoin and perhaps a smattering of other fully mined altcoins. (Ether is usually excluded from this list.) They view bitcoin and its ilk as the only true censorship-resistant systems, neither reliant on third parties to operate nor at risk of being shut down by regulators.
But token issuance can’t be wished away. It’s here to stay.
Irrespective of the debated legal distinctions between “securities” and “utility tokens,” sales of these digital assets have already proven to be an effective way to bootstrap the development of decentralized networks and decentralized applications (dapps) that thrive within them. It’s not clear whether pure cryptocurrencies such as bitcoin, bogged with scaling challenges, will ever have the capability to support the smart contract functionality that dapps require.
The case for self-regulation
Once you accept the premise that ICOs are here to stay, it should also be apparent that in order to flourish they must operate within a constructive legal framework.
This is not to say that token projects shouldn’t be disruptive, but it is an acknowledgement of the need for pragmatism. It should be possible for crypto developers and entrepreneurs to hold true to their disruptive, decentralizing, and anti-corporate principles yet also foster a less cynical, more realistic relationship with government.
The best route to a constructive legal framework is to foster a reliable, structured system of self-regulation, which can be designed to soften the compliance blow for startups. Most of the responsibility for boosting public confidence in the technology should rest with industry participants rather than law enforcement but fall within a predictable legal framework. We must develop standards of accountability, attestation, reputation and certification (decentralized or otherwise) that weed out bad actors from the market and do so in a way that gives regulators confidence that the social objectives that define their mission are being upheld.
This is the basic principle behind self-regulatory organizations (SROs) at regulated exchanges and traditional certifying bodies in finance such as the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). This is not to say the crypto industry should follow these heavy-handed approaches, which are rightly criticized for overly protecting incumbents. Rather, it is to say with the help of the kind of transparency and accountability offered by blockchain technology and crypto innovations such as multi-signature custody, an opportunity exists to build institutions that foster both public confidence and startup-led innovation.
For this self-regulatory approach to succeed, the authors of the Token Alliance paper argue what is vital is for governments to provide a supportive legal framework. Here, in their bid to educate regulators, they favorably describe the approach applied in the U.K. territory of Gibraltar, which requires “adequate, accurate, and balanced disclosure of information to enable anyone considering purchasing digital tokens to make an informed decision.”
The section on Gibraltar's forward-looking framework for token regulation stands in stark contrast to preceding sections, which cover evolving legal approaches in Australia, Canada, the U.K. and the U.S. Taken together, these paint a picture of continued uncertainty and contradictory perspectives.
On the industry education side, the Token Alliance paper takes a decent stab at laying down principles for how development teams that take on the role of “token sponsor” should bring their tokens into the world if they are to avoid having to comply with securities law.
Some of these proposed principles will be unwelcome to teams who’ve viewed ICOs as get-rich-quick opportunities. The authors argue, for example, that sponsors’ white papers “should avoid discussion of any allocation of tokens for investors, developers, founders, or employees, “ since these facts would be more relevant to an investor than a token user, highlighting the token’s vulnerability to being regulated as a security.
This, however, is the price of growing up and it's a price worth paying. – Michael J. Casey |
Beyond CoinDesk...
WHAT OTHERS ARE SAYING BBC: The devastating effect of Hurricane Maria on Puerto Rico set off a series of unlikely events that has led to what some would consider a “blockchain boom” on the island. In a 27-minute podcast, BBC reporter Rafael Abuchaibe explains why some residents are looking to blockchain as the road back to financial prosperity for Puerto Rico. BLOOMBERG: What are people actually using their bitcoin for? Bloomberg quotes new figures from Coinmetrics claiming as much as two-thirds of total transaction activity on the blockchain has nothing to do with trading or purchase of goods, but rather a host of other "non-economic" activities such as mixing coins or spamming the network. FORBES: Have you ever heard of a diet high in fat? The Keto diet dates back to the 1920’s and is reportedly gaining traction among crypto enthusiasts today for having a “counterculture feel” able to spark “superhuman mental abilities.” HANDELSBLATT: Germany’s energy market is potentially gearing up for a blockchain revolution, according to this German news publication that recounts the many potential use cases for the technology as it relates to the country's diversified power industry. WHAT WE'VE BEEN UP TO We've launched our first podcast, Late Confirmation. Subscribe and listen to our daily recap of the top stories in the blockchain world. And make sure to read our newly released State of Blockchain Q2 2018 report, a deep dive with more than 100 slides analyzing the trends and forces that are shaping the industry. For real-time price updates and technical market analysis, follow @CoinDeskMarkets. And everyone interested in keeping up with this fascinating and rapidly evolving field of technology should follow our main Twitter handle, @CoinDesk Send feedback on this newsletter to marc@coindesk.com. Thanks for reading! Until next week...  |
|
| | | | | | | | |
No comments:
Post a Comment